Appreciation


I’ve had a wonderful semester.  I’ve seen a lot of great things.  Traveling through Europe, I had a fantastic stays in London, Amsterdam, Prague, and Krakow.  I also got to see Zurich, Vienna, and regrettably Katowice.  In France, I’ve been to Disneyland Paris, Reims (where they make Champagne), Etretat (breathtaking sheer cliffs on the coast), Chantilly (famous for whipped cream), Mulhouse, Omaha Beach and the rest of Normandy.  In Paris, I’ve been to the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre, the Musee d’Orsay, the Centre Pompidou, the Arc de Triomphe, Notre Dame, Sacre Coeur, Pere Lachaise, the Catacombs, the Tuileries, Place de Concorde, Invalides, Place de Madeleine, the Grande Arche, the Montparnasse Tower, and a variety of lesser attractions.  The amount of things to see and do in the city is staggering.  By the end of our second day in Prague, one of Europe’s greatest cities, we had essentially seen everything that it has to offer. When we came to that realization, we also agreed that although we had been in Paris for 3 months, we still hadn’t seen everything there.

With all of that said, I don’t think I’ll be able to fully appreciate it while I’m here.  I recognize how wonderful everything is, and I am incredibly fortunate to have had a semester in Paris.  Still, I know that I’ll need to be back in Brookline before I can fully frame how great it was.  That’s just the way it is.  I would like to sum this semester up now, but I don’t think that I could do so accurately.  l’ll need some time for reflection. Maybe it will take a week.  Maybe it will take a month.  I don’t know.  What I do know, Europe, is that it’s been a great ride.  See you around.

5/21/10

Random Thoughts


As my time in Paris draws to a close, there are some things that I haven’t been able to blog about.  Anecdotes that didn’t fit in a narrative, quirks that I got used to and neglected to mention, and stories that I forget about.  Anyway, here they are.

  • The Metro is incredibly efficient.  I rarely have to wait more than 3 minutes for a train.  It is possible to get almost anywhere in the city from almost anywhere else in the city in half an hour.  The system is great.  I have no complaints about how it is run.  However, there is one curiosity about the process.  Every station has a board that displays the time and how long it will be until the next two trains come.  So, it might say the 1st train is 3 minutes away and the second might be 5.  This is useful knowledge, and is much more reassuring than waiting for a bus on a street corner.  For the most part, it is accurate too.  However, all of the displays have some sort of hang-up when the board gets to 2 minutes. Sometimes I will get to a station and see that there are 2 minutes until the next train.  2 minutes later I’ll look and it will still say that that same train is still going to arrive in 2 minutes.  I have a decent enough sense of time to know when a minute has passed.  The display should at the very least be telling me that the next train is only 1 minute away, but it has instead decided to stop.  It doesn’t stop like that on any other amount of time though.  Even more, it is not uncommon for the display to jump directly from 2 minutes to 0 minutes, almost as if it were caught off guard by the train.  I don’t know why this happens.  I have no hypothesis on the matter, but I have seen it far too many times for it to be a coincidence or glitch.
  • As I just noted, the Metro is very efficient.  Most locations are easy to get to. Landmarks in particular are very easy to get to.  The exception?  Strangely, the Eiffel Tower.  It is located in a void on the Metro map.  Everywhere else there are multiple stations within a couple blocks.  At the Eiffel Tower, there is nothing closer than half a mile away.  I’m not sure that comparison stresses just how unusual the location is.  When I go somewhere new, I glance at the Metro map to find out how to get there.  I have a variety of lines to choose from, and usually have a bit of flexibility.  If one line isn’t running, another one will get me close enough.  So, when I looked at the Eiffel Tower on the map, I was shocked to see no reasonable options.  Again, I have no hypothesis.  In a city that prides itself on its Metro, it would seem logical that there would be a stop near one of the most iconic monuments in the world.  Apparently not.
  • Parisians use a lot of water.  Not to drink, annoyingly, but to clean stuff.  Every day I walk over just-washed sidewalks.  Being the modern city that it is, Paris has gutters to channel and collect this water.  They work well.  They fulfill their stated task.  At least in my eyes.  Clearly, the Paris Department of Public Works thinks otherwise.  Multiple times a week, I will see water flowing at a decent speed in a gutter towards a sewer.  Then, I will see some sort of public servant take a broom and push the water in the direction it is already flowing.  To recap: the public servant uses a broom to maker water go in the direction it is already going.  Not stagnant water, actively moving water.  There is literally no purpose to his action.  It is not in the least but productive.  Still, no hypothesis.  Cultural differences, you strike again!
  • This next thought is probably the reason the sidewalks are always washed. Parisians don’t pick up after their dogs.  There is dog poop on the sidewalks every day.  Some dogs are so regular that there are spots on my daily commute that I know to avoid.  Apparently, Parisians think it is the job of public workers to clean up the poop.  I’m also sure it isn’t fashionable to carry poop in a bag.  It would be quite a faux pas.  In my mind, this is the most damning evidence against the claim that Paris is the most romantic city in the world.  It’s also the only negative evidence I can come up with.  Well, besides B.O.
  • I haven’t talked about my host mother in a while, but I realized that there were a couple early stories that I forget about.  In my first week here, I was just getting situated.  I didn’t know where many things were.  I was still jet lagged.  I was speaking French for the first time in a few years.  I was adjusting to a lot.  I also had to blow my nose a lot.  It was, after all, winter.  Also, I blow my nose all the time.  Because I was still adjusting, I hadn’t bought tissues yet.  Nor, for whatever reason, had I brought any with me.  So, I used the toilet paper (!!!!!!) in the bathroom.  After I had been there for a few days, my host mother walked by my room.  To yell at me.  Naturally, she was upset about my using the toilet paper to blow my nose (I should have made this connection earlier).  She urged me to instead buy a handkerchief, which simply weirded me out.  The whole concept seems strange.  Why would I want to keep blowing my nose in the same piece of cloth?  Isn’t that terribly dirty? Before I could contemplate handkerchiefs too much, she continued to air her grievances.  I wasn’t blown away by the toilet paper.  However, I was totally stunned when she told me I couldn’t leave my wet towel in my room.  I still don’t know why.  For my first few days, after I took a shower I would walk back to my room, take off my towel, and get dressed.  The natural move from there was simply to hang the towel up.  Evidently, that was not a good idea.  Oh cultural differences…
  • Staying on the subject, a week later there was a Saturday morning excursion.  Because I would have to wake up at 6 in the morning, I went to sleep fairly early Friday night.  When my host parents returned, I was dozing off.  She was particularly loud, which was fine.  It didn’t really bother me.  However, the next day, she apologized.  She told me that she didn’t realize that I was there and I assumed I must have gone on a trip.  That is also fine.  It wasn’t until months later when I connected that comment to the time she yelled at me 5 hours after I’d left for not telling her that I’d gone on a trip.  Can I get some consistency please?
  • The best eclairs I’ve ever had remain the eclairs from New Paris Bakery in Brookline.  That doesn’t seem right.  Is that ironic?  Is it meta?  It’s certainly confusing.  On a related note, chocolate croissants are disappointing.  They don’t have enough chocolate but also aren’t as buttery as regular croissants.  To get a delicious, chocolate baked good, a cravate is the way to go.  It’s like a flatter croissant with more chocolate and a creamier center.
  • Finally, internet advertising is a little different here.  In the US, an ad online might promise a free iPod or XBOX if you answer a few questions.  Obviously, those ads are bogus.  If you click on them, they talk you to a shady website that will most assuredly not give you something for free.  Still, they reflect what we are interested in as a society.  In France, they have the same ads. They don’t offer the same prizes though.  Instead of electronics, they offer US green cards. Seriously.  I thought this was fascinating.  At the same time, no one could possibly fall for that right?  An iPod is a prize that someone could legitimately win, perhaps in a school raffle.  A green card is far too complicated to be offered as a prize right?  Right?

5/19/10

    B.O.


    One of the stereotypes about French people is that they smell.  I anticipated that this might be a problem.  Who wants to be surrounded by smelly people for 4 months?  What I’ve found has altered my perception a little.  I was planning on writing about this once it got warm, because I thought that would give be a better idea of how much Parisians smell.  It’s easy to mask your smell when you’re covered in layers and heavy jackets.  When it’s 80 degrees, there’s no hiding.  Unfortunately, Paris seems to have no intention of being “warm” while I’m here.  I saw my breath a couple days ago.  I still wear my fleece every day.

    I do still have an opinion on the matter though.  Because the city is so dense and the metro is so packed, I am in close proximity to hundreds of people every day.  Most of them don’t smell, which I appreciate.  I’m going to say that 80% don’t accost me with their odor.  The other 20% bothers me though.  If everyone smelled, I could understand that.  It would drive me crazy, but it would be easy to chalk it up to a cultural difference.  It would be simple enough, and I could leave it at that.  However, the fact that so many people make an attempt to smell presentable makes me angry at the remaining 20%.  When so many of their fellow city-dwellers try to smell nice, the fact that they do not is just obnoxious.  It’s not a cultural difference, because so many Parisians realize that it is a good idea to not exude stink.  Even more, these are well-dressed people.  They don’t smell because they lack the means to adequately bathe.

    What makes it even worse, as I mentioned above, is that Paris is so compact.  These people who smell know they are going to be very close to a lot of people every day.  It’s not, “I don’t feel like showering because I’m not leaving the house today.”  They know people are going to smell them, and they still smell.  Every time I’m near one of them on the Metro I get legitimately angry.  There is nothing good about what they do.  Why do I have to smell them? I want to yell at them, but again, conversation and eye contact on the Metro are frowned upon.

    Moral of the story: although Parisians dress better than Americans, they smell worse.  I don’t think that’s a favorable trade-off for them.

    5/15/10

    Speaking French


    Although I wasn’t always sure that I would study abroad, I always assumed that if I did I would go to Europe.  It never really crossed my mind to go anywhere else.  With so many cultures and so much history compressed into such a small area, it intrigued me in ways that nowhere else in the world could.  In Paris, I am a few hours from a handful of the greatest cities in the world.   If I studied in South Africa or Australia, those travel opportunities wouldn’t be there.  Pretoria and Brisbane don’t have quite the same cache as Barcelona and Prague.  With that being said, it was not an inevitability that I would study in Paris.

    For a while, I actually planned on going to London.  My rationale was essentially that it’s a great city and that they speak English.  Nothing about that has changed.  London is great, and I certainly would have enjoyed studying there.  However, as I approached the time when I would need to apply for an abroad program, I began to think of London as a cop-out.  Studying abroad is about pushing yourself and experiencing new cultures.  How much of a push is it to study in the most American European country?  I wouldn’t even have to deal with a language barrier.

    With that in mind, I began to look into other cities.  I chose Paris, obviously.  Although there were a number of factors involved in the decision, like the fact that Paris is awesome, ultimately it came down to the fact that I had taken French for 6 years and I should use it somewhere.  Solid logic right?

    Anyway, the point of this post is to talk about my knowledge of the French language.  It’s part of the reason I’m here, and has obviously colored my experience thus far.  I am not fluent.  I won’t be fluent unless I come back to live here.  However, I can understand most conversations.  Perhaps not intricate details, but I can always follow what’s going on.  My ear is very well tuned to the French language.

    My mouth?  That’s a different story.  My accent is terribly mediocre.  I try, but it’s just not there.  The last time I took French, senior year of high school, my poor accent was a running joke.  A few times a week, I would be forced to repeat the phrase, “Ma soeur mort a une heure” in front of the whole class.  It means, “my sister died at 1,” but that’s not important.  Because soeur, mort, and heure have subtly different sounds, the point was to push me to vocalize those differences.  I butchered it every time.  I was openly mocked by my teacher ( in a good way, he was one of my favorites).  The point is, I don’t sound like a native French speaker.

    Not surprisingly, Parisians have picked up on this.  Oftentimes, I’ll address someone in French and they will respond to me in English.  This bothers me.  I’d like to be able to sound French.  So, I will then respond to them in French.  Usually, this sets the tone for the rest of the interaction, and we will continue in French.  Sometimes though, the Parisian will again respond to me in English, which initiates a game of bilingual Chicken.  I don’t want to give in, which leads to an absurd dialogue between a French person’s broken English and an American’s auditorially-lacking French.

    All told, my knowledge of French has improved.  I have also learned how to look and act like a Parisian.  I can successfully participate in almost  every aspect of Parisian life.  The only exception is actually speaking French.  That is of course a terrible flaw, but it’s the closest I’m going to get.

    5/10/10

    Milk


    Because my previous post was somber and far heavier than anything else I’ve written about, I’m just going to acknowledge its existence.  There isn’t anything that I could write to follow it, so I’m not going to try.  Instead, I’m going to write about something light and simple: milk.

    I enjoy milk quite a bit.  I always have.  I order it in fine restaurants, sometimes to the consternation of the people dining with me. I can’t think of anything better with chocolate chip cookies or a big piece of cake.  When I’m home, I have a couple glasses every day.  Sometimes I even drink a glass after playing basketball.  I can imagine drinking it with almost any meal.  In my time here, I’ve realized that I miss it much more than I initially thought I would.  I really think it is a great beverage.

    Evidently, the French disagree.  It is considered a children’s drink.  Once someone is a teenager, it is no longer socially acceptable for them to drink it.  If they do, they’re considered “immature.”  Or something.  I don’t really follow the thinking, but I can understand not wanting to drink the milk here.  It is terribly mediocre.

    The sterilization process here is different.  I don’t know what the differences are, because I don’t know the intricacies of the process in America.  However, the product that is produced in France IS different.  It is designed to have a long shelf-life, so you can leave it un-refrigerated for weeks or months without opening it and it will be fine. This concept bothers me.  It seems unnatural.  What am I really drinking?  Ew. 

    That’s not the real problem though.  The real problem occurs when the milk is opened. I can’t tell when it’s fresh and when it’s sour.  When a fresh carton is opened, it smells like what sour milk smells like in America.  It’s not sour though.  It just smells that way. It doesn’t taste sour.  It doesn’t taste all that great either, but it’s not sour.  It just feels off. However, when it does turn sour, it doesn’t smell any MORE sour.  If anything, it might smell a little less sour.  This is of course counterintuitive, and has confused me quite a bit.  I have to smell the milk and then convince myself that it is fresh or sour, without totally believing what I’m thinking.  Honestly, it’s nerve-wracking.  Sour milk is terrible, and I’m never totally confident that I’m not about to drink it.  It’s one thing to take a sip and then realize that it’s sour.  That’s unpleasant.  What if I drink a whole glass and don’t realize that it’s gone bad?  That would end terribly.  That would be my worst day in France. Combine that with the fact that, at its best, the milk doesn’t taste that great, and I’ve essentially stopped drinking milk.  France is known for its cheese, but who knew it would scare me away from drinking milk?

    5/3/10

    Auschwitz


    I went to Auschwitz on Friday.  It was a difficult place to see.  I had been anticipating this portion of the trip in a way I have never anticipated anything before.  The entire reason we added Krakow to our trip was because it would allow us to go to Auschwitz.  As soon as we booked our tickets, I began to think about what it would be like.  I was looking forward to it, but not in the way you look forward to something that would be fun.  I knew that I would see horrible things, but a part of me wanted to go.  I can’t totally describe this feeling, but I would have been far more disappointed if this portion of my break were cancelled.  As a person, and especially as a Jew, it felt right to acknowledge those atrocities in person.  

    If you don’t want to read further, I understand.  There is nothing “nice” about what I’m about to write.  I need to write about it somewhere though.

    Our tour began at Auschwitz I, the original camp.  It was a small portion of the camp, but it housed most of what we saw.  It consists of rows of brick buildings, which were either overcrowded with prisoners or used for other means.  We were taken first through a building that detailed the living conditions the prisoners had to endure.  These were, of course, terrible.  The rooms were cramped, unsanitary, and lacked the remotest semblance of comfort.  They were not livable conditions.

    From there, we went to a different building that detailed what the Nazis took from the people in the camp.  This was the first time Auschwitz really got to me.  I had been expecting to cry.  I had assumed that it would happen, and I had no intentions of holding back.  I didn’t cry though.  The first room we walked into had hair behind a glass wall.  The Nazis shaved everyone when they entered the camp, and I had assumed that this was a representation of that practice.  It wasn’t.  It was real hair. They had retained thousands of pounds of women’s hair.  Sixty years later, it was on the other side of the glass from me, and I got nauseous.  I had to turn away and keep moving.  It was a terrible realization, for so many reasons.  The fact that it was real greatly bothered me.  

    The next few rooms echoed that theme.  One room was stacked with glasses.  Another had combs.  One had shoes.  These were all items that prisoners had brought with them to the camp, and remain there to this day.  A larger room contained the suitcases of the victims.  The Nazis had instructed them to pack their luggage in a specific manner.  The Nazis told them that they were going to be relocated to another city where jobs were waiting for them.  Seeing these suitcases, which for some had been filled with the promise of a new life only hours before they died, was chilling.  

    In the next room, there were Zyklon B canisters.  Used Zyklon B canisters.  That is the gas the Nazis used to kill their victims.  I was again nauseous and had to keep moving.

    The next building was devoted to the prisoners, and we walked down a hallway that was lined with their pictures.  Those pictures were taken upon a prisoner’s entrance to Auschwitz.  The only information below the picture was the prisoner’s name, the day they came to Auschwitz, and the day they died.  No one lived very long.  I didn’t see anyone who survived more than three months, and many died after a few days.  As if it needed any reinforcement, this reaffirmed how dangerous and terrible Auschwitz was.  In the same building, there was a map of all of the locations that Auschwitz prisoners were taken from.  It was naturally focalized closer to Poland.  However, prisoners were taken from as far away as Rome, Oslo, and yes, Paris.  Living in Paris, this unnerved me.  It seemed like, at one point, the Nazis could take people from anywhere they wanted.  From there, I walked outside.  Most of our group was still inside, so I looked around for a moment.  We were on the edge of the camp, and there were three rows of very tall barbed-wire fences.  They were electrified when the camp was operating.  Resting above and outside the fences were guard towers.  There was no way someone could escape from the inside of Auschwitz.

    The next stop was the execution wall.  It was next to the building where soldiers were tortured.  This could include making them stand for days on end or a number of other tortures.  The fact that they felt the need to torture the prisoners more than they already were or execute them when they were already dying surprised me.  There are not words to describe how terrible they were.

    From there, we went to a gas chamber.  I actually stood inside a gas chamber and looked up at where the gas came from.  This was surreal.  It didn’t seem real.  It was a simple enough building, but sixty years ago it was used to commit evil acts.  I still haven’t totally digested standing there.  Lying in the adjacent room were the ovens used to dispose of the bodies.  Seeing them in person, and realizing that there was a hole big enough for a body to be placed through, I couldn’t handle it.  I left after a few seconds.  It was simply terrible.

    After that, we went to Auschwitz II-Birkenau.  This was the larger portion of the camp, and it was really big.  It was in an open field with rows of barracks, delineated by barbed wire.  The sheer size was shocking.  Reconciling all of the terrible things in Auschwitz I with the size of the rest of the camp, I was again bombarded with just how despicable it was.

    Everything I saw was terrible.  I was well aware of what the Nazis did, but seeing evidence in person is far stronger.  I am glad that I went, but I don’t want to go again.  It really is a depressing place.

    4/29/10

    Eastern Europe


    That volcano knocked us down, but it couldn’t knock us out.  After my Friday and Sunday flights to Budapest were both canceled , it became apparent that we weren’t going to be able to fly to any of our destinations.  So, we decided to take trains instead.  Booking so late, there were not a lot of options.  The only way for us to get to Prague (one of the two cities we were still booked in) was to take 4 trains over the course of 26 hours.  Yes, 26 hours.  To recap:

    • Our first train, last Monday afternoon, was from Paris to Mulhouse.  Upon hearing my itinerary, my Dad’s reaction was, “What’s a Mulhouse?”  Exactly.  It is a fine little town near the Swiss and German borders, but nothing special.
    • The next stop was Zurich.  It was very clean.  Everything seemed modern and well organized, no surprises there.  As we walked around though, we saw and heard marching bands, which was surprising.  It was, after all, a Monday night.  Upon further review, we had stumbled into Sechselauten, which is a holiday to mark the beginning of summer.  All of the marching bands had begun to coalesce in one big square when we had to get to our next train.  It would have been nice to stay the night.
    • We then went overnight to Vienna.  Not much to report here, but trying to sleep in chairs that aren’t built for sleeping is not recommended.  Especially when those chairs are on a train.  Or when ticket-takers barge in every few hours by throwing the door open and unnecessarily turning the light on to check the tickets they’ve already checked.  Or when the brother and sister (or possibly boyfriend and girlfriend, hard to tell) in the compartment begin animatedly talking in German at all times of the night.  Needless to say, I’ve slept better.  When we arrived in Vienna we did not have a lot of time to look around.  What we did see was somewhere between mediocre and nondescript.  Apparently, all of the nice parts of Vienna are inside the Ringstrasse, which I assume is some sort of defined barrier that encircles the city.  Evidently, we were outside the Ringstrasse.

    Quite unimpressed, we got back on the train to Prague.  5 hours later, we were there.  I liked Prague.  It is very pretty.  We saw the Charles Bridge, a few churches, and the castle, because every European city has a castle.  These were all impressive.  Not mind-blowing, but definitely cool.  We also went to a museum for medieval torture instruments.  It was strangely compelling.  The torture methods that used were of course obscene, but they were often very creative with their sadism.  As unique and unexpected museums go, this was a good one.  After that, we went to the Lennon Wall.  I’m not clear on why it’s there, but it is a really cool tribute to John Lennon and is covered with messages and well-done graffiti.  I can’t do it justice without pictures, but it is the product of thousands of visitors who all want to add their own personal touch.  Much of the messages have to do with peace and love, but there is also someone who spray-painted a fairly accurate image of Jimi Hendrix.  The variety of expression is fantastic, and I was really excited to see that someone had left a message about the Red Sox.  The Nation is everywhere.

    From there, we went to Krakow.  We didn’t have a direct train though, and we had to stop in Katowice.  Don’t go there.  Ever.  It is a city in southern Poland, and I’m not sure they know that the Cold War is over.  It certainly doesn’t look like they’ve done anything since it ended.  All of the signs were rusty.  The paint was peeling.  Everything was dark, dirty, and grey.  It was far colder than any other city I’ve been in the past week, north or south.  The station appeared to be located in some sort of industrial wasteland.  It fit every stereotype I have about what Soviet Russia must have been like.  The people we spoke to were all very gruff and disinterested.  I am fairly certain that the man who directed us to our platform was in the KGB or a similar branch of skull-crushing during the Soviet years.  Besides his grizzled appearance, massive hands, and generally intimidating demeanor, he had a tattoo between his thumb and index finger. I can’t totally explain why this bothered me, but he seemed like a man who would find tattoos superfluous.  He didn’t seem like someone who would get inked just to commemorate something for sentimental reasons.  More than that, the webbing between the thumb and index finger is a strange place to get a tattoo.  I’ve never seen that before, and I decided to look it up.  Apparently, that is a common location for people to get a tattoo that indicates their membership in a gang or stay in prison.  Especially in and around Russia.  This was your average worker in Katowice.  

    When we found our platform, we had a little time before the train was going to arrive, so I went to get some food.  As I walked through the corridors, I realized that I could not understand anything around me.  It wasn’t just that I didn’t know the language, I didn’t know what I was looking at it.  I couldn’t tell which booths and stores were open, and in many cases I couldn’t even tell what kind of food I was looking at.  I felt utterly lost.  Eventually, I saw a sign for a stand that sold hamburgers.  When in doubt, I order hamburgers, because they are generally one of the most demanded options and thus the least likely to be screwed up.  So, I was happy about this option.  I went to order my hamburger, and upon doing so, realized that the meat was leaning towards orange.  It wasn’t the color a hamburger should be, but I had already committed.   The hamburger went into a microwave, and I waited.  When it came out, the woman who was serving me placed it on the opposite counter, in a position where her body blocked it from my view.  She apparently then proceeded to place every condiment imaginable on my burger.  There was mustard, ketchup, a pickle, some strange orange sauce, a mysterious Polish relish, and even some onions.  By the time I realized what had happened, it was too late.  I sullenly took my burger and returned to the platform.  There, I was informed by Sam, my traveling companion, that my burger looked horrible and that I had to eat it somewhere else.  Agreeing with that analysis but also incredibly hungry, I tried to begin the burger.  3 bites in, I realized that I could not handle the condiments.  There was too much going on, and most of it was terrible.  So, I tried to dump most of it off.  I wasn’t even able to do that though, because my burger was in a sandwich holder where one end is open to eat out of and the other is closed to keep anything from falling out.  Not only had the other end kept my condiments from falling out, it had mashed them all over the bun and burger.  It was just a mess.  Both disgusted and disappointed, I tried to keep going.  A couple bites later, I bit into what I think most closely resembles the bark from a twig.  Right there, I checked out.  I was done with that burger.  Katowice was terrible.

    We arrived in Krakow a couple hours later, and I was stunned.  It was fantastic.  I had been expecting something like Katowice, but it was really modern.  It had the enviable combination of big-city energy and small-town feel.  Everything was welcoming, and it was a really pretty city.  It also had great food.  I had pierogies for dinner Thursday night, and they were amazing.  I know I might sway towards hyperbole from time to time, but those pierogies were one of the best foods I’ve ever eaten.  They could not have been better in any way.  After that, I enjoyed my time in Krakow.  My Friday activities deserve their own post, and Saturday I returned to Paris.  I’ve never been so happy to hear French.

    4/26/10

    Iceland


    Tax day sucks.  This is a common refrain.  I felt the same way yesterday.  Not because of taxes though, I barely have any income.  Tax day 2010 was the day that the volcano in Iceland decided to poop on Western Europe.  At this point you’ve heard about it.  Why am I so upset?  Today was supposed to be the first day of my spring break; Budapest-Vienna-Prague-Krakow.  I was going to spend 2 days in each city, and it was going to be great.  It was going to be my grand tour of Eastern Europe.  Now, my plans are up in the air.  Literally.  The glass particles are floating up there waiting to destroy jet engines (that pun was far too obvious and relevant to pass up).  I was scheduled to fly to Budapest this morning.  The next available flight was Sunday, but there’s no guarantee that flights will be going out then.  So, this Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland is keeping me from going to Hungary.  Who knew that I would have to worry about a volcano in Western Europe?  I would love to vent, so here are some facts and figures about this explosion and my general anger with Iceland:

    • This is, by far, the largest grounding of air traffic since 9/11.
    • Airlines are losing about $200 million a day.  Think about that.
    • Flights have been cancelled in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,  Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.  In many cases, all of the flights in those countries have been cancelled.
    • Amazingly, there are still flights going in and out of the airport in Reykjavik.  Were I in that country, I could get on a direct flight to Boston tomorrow afternoon.
    • The last time this volcano erupted, it did so for over a year.
    • Experts think that this eruption could hinder air travel for more than 6 months.
    • Upon hearing this, I actually googled “boats to America” to make sure that I can get home in May.  This actually happened.  I was not being ironic.  I was researching it as a legitimate mode of transportation.  Because a volcano erupted in Iceland yesterday, I might not be able to fly home in a month and a half.  Ridiculous.  This shouldn’t happen in 2010.
    • I was planning on going break with a couple other people.  Because of the massive cancellations, the 3 of us are flying to Eastern Europe on 3 separate days and into 2 separate cities.  We were online at the same time re-booking our trip.  There were seconds separating these bookings but we were not able to stay together at all.  I leave first, getting to Budapest on Sunday.  Jill doesn’t get to Prague until Wednesday.  Iceland is to blame for all of this.

    Now, I understand that Iceland isn’t actually at fault.  This would have happened even if they weren’t bankrupt, in the midst of a massive exodus, and the most genetically homogenous country in the world.  There is not much they could have done if they were rich, had an influx of people, or were not all the same person.  I want to have a scapegoat though.  Who can get mad at tectonic plates?

    4/16/10

    A Few Things


    Dear Blog,

    I’m sorry I haven’t been paying enough attention to you, but I really haven’t known what to say.  I’ve started to try and talk to you, but I haven’t known how to keep you interested.

    I wanted to write about the Butler-Duke National Championship.  I wanted to talk about how I woke up at 3 Am to watch, or about how I was dreadfully tired the next day.  I wanted to talk about how much I hate Duke, but I felt like that would come across as both whining and complaining, which would only hurt your opinion of me.  I also wanted to talk about how Gordon Hayward was just an inch away from making that shot.  One inch.  So close.

    Anyway blog, I also wanted to write about my confusion regarding socialism in relation to the service industry here in Paris.  I was initially confused at the fact that even though France is far more socialized than the US, service here is much worse.  I thought it through though, so I am no longer puzzled.

    More recently, I thought that it would be a good idea to write about KFC’s new Destroyer of Worlds, the Double Down: http://www.kfc.com/doubledown/.  This is an absurd example of American excess.  At first I was repulsed.  Now, I am intrigued.  This is the kind of thing that could never happen in France.  That is exactly why I want to try it.  It will probably make me feel terrible about myself, but I’m willing to take that chance.  

    Finally, blog, I am back.  Briefly though.  I am here to complain, because a volcano in Iceland might keep me from going to Hungary.  The ash from said volcano is clogging the airspace in northern Europe, and that has never happened before.  I am planning on going to Eastern Europe for spring break, but there is a volcano in the way.  How could I possibly have predicted that?  This is terrible.  So, if all goes well, I’ll be away from the internet for 9 days.  If not, see you soon.

    Your dearest friend,

    Dan

    4/15/10

    Parents


    My parents came to visit last week.  It was great to have them here.  They really loved the city, and I ate steak every day.  It was also good to see them.  They saw museums, we walked around, and ate good food.  On Tuesday, they went to the Musee d’Orsay, which is like the Louvre’s younger brother.  It’s just across the Seine, and is definitively the second most popular museum in the city.  I was hoping they would see Jay-Z there, because if Diddy goes to the Louvre, Jay-Z has to go to the Musee d’Orsay right?  Am I just making stuff up?

    On Friday, we went to the Catacombs.  It is an underground network where a number of Parisian cemeteries were moved after they became a health risk.  In all, 6 million people are buried there.  By buried, I mean their bones are grouped together around underground walkways that are shorter than me.  There were skulls and femurs everywhere.  I have never spent so much time with human skulls.  It was weird.  After that, we went to Versailles.  From bones to decadence!

    On Saturday, my Dad got pickpocketed, which was quite a hassle.  It got me thinking about how pickpockets are jerks.  They’re much worse than muggers.  Muggers confront you and are only after your money.  They intimidate you, you empty your wallet, and you’re on your way.  You’ve lost some money, but that’s it.  Pickpockets are cowards.  They try to avoid your notice, and reach into your pocket, which is far more violating.  They then take your whole wallet, no matter what’s in there.  They get credit cards, even though the owner will almost certainly cancel them.  They get ID cards, even though there’s virtually no chance that they will be able to use them.  They might even get personal affects, which are in many cases a bigger loss.  They don’t care though, because they might be able to get a little cash.  Fortunately, that was the only dark spot in an otherwise great week.

    4/7/10